NBA 2026–27 season · results through Nov 2, 2026 · 309 graded picks · 19 sources · 46 named analysts
NBA expert picks leaderboard, 2026–27
We record the NBA picks that outlets, channels and analysts publish, note when each one was seen, and grade each one against the final score. By default, standings rank sources by market-adjusted points on priced picks (minimum 15 scored picks and 10 priced picks early in the season; 8 to 14 picks in the early-sample tier). Switch to win-loss records to include result-only picks recorded without a price.
We record the picks that outlets, channels and analysts publish and grade each one against the final score. We don't make picks, we don't sell picks, and we don't link to betting pages.
Early in the season: 309 graded picks from 19 sources and 46 named analysts. Few names reach the 15-pick main tier yet; the early-sample tier and the win-loss view show who is on the way.
Season leaders
Top source by market-adjusted points on the winner (10+ priced picks): ProtoLab (프로토랩) (+3.9 on 37 priced picks).
Market-adjusted points: a right pick earns more when the market thought it unlikely and less when it was the obvious call; a wrong pick costs the same either way, and a push counts zero. The price is the no-margin market price at the time of the pick. These points measure pick results against market odds; they do not represent betting returns. How points work
How the 2026–27 picks were recorded · 543 recordings, including 197 repeats of the same pick
- 413 Recorded before tip-off (76%)
- 26 Timestamped before tip-off (5%)
- 104 Read after the game (19%)
Read after the game: the pick as the source shows it now, read after the game started, with no verifiable pre-game stamp. These picks are shown and counted in recording history only; they do not enter records, points or leaderboards. What the labels mean →
How this leaderboard works: sources vs. analysts, priced picks and sample thresholds
Why sources come first: in daily NBA coverage, most public picks are published by an outlet, YouTube show or Telegram channel without a personal writer byline. The primary table ranks all tracked outlets and channels. The second table compares individual writers and speakers whose names are attached to their picks.
Single-voice sources vs. multi-writer panels: a single-voice source is an editorial column, YouTube show or Telegram channel that publishes one pick per market on a game. A multi-writer panel is an outlet where several named writers publish picks on the same game and may pick against each other; its combined count is shown on its source page.
Two grading views: by market-adjusted points (default, priced picks only) ranks sources by how their priced picks performed against the no-margin market odds at pick time; a correct underdog pick earns more than an obvious favorite, a wrong pick costs the same either way, a push counts zero. By win-loss record (all graded picks) includes result-only picks recorded without odds and is sorted by the low end of each source's 95% likely range, so a tiny unbeaten sample does not outrank a proven record.
Columns
- Graded W-L-P and Win %: wins–losses–pushes across all settled picks on this market, including unpriced picks. Pushes are excluded from Win %.
- 95% likely range: the 95% Wilson score interval for the source's true win rate given the sample graded so far.
- Priced picks: how many of the source's graded picks carried a market price at the time of the pick. Only priced picks enter Points, Per pick and CLV.
- Points and Per pick: total and average market-adjusted points across priced picks. Zero is the expected score if the market odds are accurate.
- CLV (closing line value): average change from the recorded price to the no-margin closing price of the picked side, as a share of the closing price; positive means the pick beat the close.
- Avg fair win %: the average no-margin market win probability of the sides this source picked. Higher numbers mean the source mostly picks favorites; lower numbers mean it mostly picks underdogs.
Sources & channels
Moneyline (winner) (10 with graded picks)
1 source with at least 15 graded moneyline (winner) picks.
Market-adjusted points (priced picks only) · 1
| Place | Source | Graded W-L-P | Win % | Priced picks | Points | Per pick | CLV | Avg fair win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ProtoLab (프로토랩) Web | 24-13-0 | 64.9% 95% likely range 49–78% | 37 of 37 | +3.9 | +0.11 | -2.4% | 58% |
Win-loss record (all graded picks) · 1
Showing all graded picks, including result-only picks recorded without a price. Picks without a price count toward W-L-P and Win %, but are excluded from market-adjusted points and CLV.
| Place | Source | Graded W-L-P | Win % | Priced picks | Points | Per pick | CLV | Avg fair win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ProtoLab (프로토랩) Web | 24-13-0 | 64.9% 95% likely range 49–78% | 37 of 37 | +3.9 | +0.11 | -2.4% | 58% |
Early sample · 8 to 14 graded picks (3 sources)
These sources have between 8 and 14 graded picks on this market. They are listed with their 95% likely ranges until they reach the 15-pick threshold for the main standings.
| Source | Graded W-L-P | Win % | Priced picks | Points | Per pick | CLV | Avg fair win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basketball Sphere Web Panel · 7 writers | 9-5-0 | 64.3% 95% likely range 39–84% | 14 of 14 | +3.5 | +0.25 | -8.7% | 53% |
| Covers Web Panel · 6 writers | 3-5-0 | 37.5% 95% likely range 14–69% | 8 of 8 | — (8 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | — | 61% |
| Pickswise Web Panel · 8 writers | 5-3-0 | 62.5% 95% likely range 31–86% | 8 of 8 | — (8 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | +6.8% | 41% |
Fewer than 8 graded picks (6 sources)
| Source | Graded W-L-P | Win % | Priced picks | Points | Per pick | CLV | Avg fair win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The JuiceBox YouTube Panel · 2 writers | 2-1-0 | 66.7% 95% likely range 21–94% | 3 of 3 | — (3 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -5.0% | 50% |
| TheTargetBet Telegram | 1-2-0 | 33.3% 95% likely range 6–79% | 3 of 3 | — (3 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -7.9% | 52% |
| Exklusive Sportwetten Telegram | 2-0-0 | 100.0% 95% likely range 34–100% | 2 of 2 | — (2 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -6.1% | 57% |
| BetBlog Web Panel · 2 writers | 0-1-0 | 0.0% 95% likely range 0–79% | 1 of 1 | — (1 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | — | 51% |
| Big Al Web Panel · 11 writers | 1-0-0 | 100.0% 95% likely range 21–100% | 1 of 1 | — (1 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -10.3% | 52% |
| VseProSport Telegram | 1-0-0 | 100.0% 95% likely range 21–100% | 1 of 1 | — (1 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -4.4% | 53% |
Spread (18 with graded picks)
3 sources with at least 15 graded spread picks.
Market-adjusted points (priced picks only) · 3
| Place | Source | Graded W-L-P | Win % | Priced picks | Points | Per pick | CLV | Avg fair win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Basketball Sphere Web Panel · 7 writers | 20-19-0 | 51.3% 95% likely range 36–66% | 36 of 39 | +0.7 | +0.02 | -6.5% | 55% |
| 2 | Pickswise Web Panel · 8 writers | 12-11-1 | 52.2% 95% likely range 33–71% | 24 of 24 | +0.6 | +0.03 | -1.4% | 51% |
| 3 | Big Al Web Panel · 11 writers | 8-9-0 | 47.1% 95% likely range 26–69% | 17 of 17 | -1.3 | -0.08 | -4.4% | 51% |
Win-loss record (all graded picks) · 3
Showing all graded picks, including result-only picks recorded without a price. Picks without a price count toward W-L-P and Win %, but are excluded from market-adjusted points and CLV.
| Place | Source | Graded W-L-P | Win % | Priced picks | Points | Per pick | CLV | Avg fair win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Basketball Sphere Web Panel · 7 writers | 20-19-0 | 51.3% 95% likely range 36–66% | 36 of 39 | +0.7 | +0.02 | -6.5% | 55% |
| 2 | Pickswise Web Panel · 8 writers | 12-11-1 | 52.2% 95% likely range 33–71% | 24 of 24 | +0.6 | +0.03 | -1.4% | 51% |
| 3 | Big Al Web Panel · 11 writers | 8-9-0 | 47.1% 95% likely range 26–69% | 17 of 17 | -1.3 | -0.08 | -4.4% | 51% |
Early sample · 8 to 14 graded picks (4 sources)
These sources have between 8 and 14 graded picks on this market. They are listed with their 95% likely ranges until they reach the 15-pick threshold for the main standings.
| Source | Graded W-L-P | Win % | Priced picks | Points | Per pick | CLV | Avg fair win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VseProSport Telegram | 7-6-0 | 53.8% 95% likely range 29–77% | 13 of 13 | +0.7 | +0.05 | -8.3% | 51% |
| Sports Chat Place Web Panel · 2 writers | 5-9-0 | 35.7% 95% likely range 16–61% | 14 of 14 | -3.9 | -0.28 | — | 50% |
| Betrush Web Panel · 4 writers | 4-5-0 | 44.4% 95% likely range 19–73% | 9 of 9 | — (9 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -1.3% | 51% |
| TheTargetBet Telegram | 2-6-0 | 25.0% 95% likely range 7–59% | 8 of 8 | — (8 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -5.6% | 53% |
Fewer than 8 graded picks (11 sources)
| Source | Graded W-L-P | Win % | Priced picks | Points | Per pick | CLV | Avg fair win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Covers Web Panel · 6 writers | 4-3-0 | 57.1% 95% likely range 25–84% | 7 of 7 | — (7 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -3.0% | 50% |
| Exklusive Sportwetten Telegram | 2-3-0 | 40.0% 95% likely range 12–77% | 4 of 5 | — (4 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -3.2% | 58% |
| The JuiceBox YouTube Panel · 2 writers | 3-2-0 | 60.0% 95% likely range 23–88% | 5 of 5 | — (5 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -3.6% | 49% |
| Play Me or Fade Me YouTube | 1-2-0 | 33.3% 95% likely range 6–79% | 3 of 3 | — (3 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -5.2% | 51% |
| Sportsbook Review Web Panel · 2 writers | 2-1-0 | 66.7% 95% likely range 21–94% | 3 of 3 | — (3 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -4.8% | 51% |
| BettingPros Web | 1-1-0 | 50.0% 95% likely range 9–91% | 1 of 2 | — (1 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | +0.0% | 50% |
| BettingPros (YouTube) YouTube | 1-1-0 | 50.0% 95% likely range 9–91% | 1 of 2 | — (1 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -1.0% | 49% |
| BetBlog Web Panel · 2 writers | 0-1-0 | 0.0% 95% likely range 0–79% | 1 of 1 | — (1 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -6.5% | 50% |
| SportsJaw Web | 0-1-0 | 0.0% 95% likely range 0–79% | 1 of 1 | — (1 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -5.5% | 51% |
| The Action Network (YouTube) YouTube | 0-1-0 | 0.0% 95% likely range 0–79% | 1 of 1 | — (1 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | — | 50% |
| Wunderdog Web | 0-1-0 | 0.0% 95% likely range 0–79% | 1 of 1 | — (1 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -26.9% | 37% |
Over/under (8 with graded picks)
1 source with at least 15 graded over/under picks.
Market-adjusted points (priced picks only) · 1
| Place | Source | Graded W-L-P | Win % | Priced picks | Points | Per pick | CLV | Avg fair win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pickswise Web Panel · 8 writers | 8-10-0 | 44.4% 95% likely range 25–66% | 17 of 18 | -0.9 | -0.05 | -2.6% | 50% |
Win-loss record (all graded picks) · 1
Showing all graded picks, including result-only picks recorded without a price. Picks without a price count toward W-L-P and Win %, but are excluded from market-adjusted points and CLV.
| Place | Source | Graded W-L-P | Win % | Priced picks | Points | Per pick | CLV | Avg fair win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pickswise Web Panel · 8 writers | 8-10-0 | 44.4% 95% likely range 25–66% | 17 of 18 | -0.9 | -0.05 | -2.6% | 50% |
Early sample · 8 to 14 graded picks (3 sources)
These sources have between 8 and 14 graded picks on this market. They are listed with their 95% likely ranges until they reach the 15-pick threshold for the main standings.
| Source | Graded W-L-P | Win % | Priced picks | Points | Per pick | CLV | Avg fair win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Big Al Web Panel · 11 writers | 9-5-0 | 64.3% 95% likely range 39–84% | 14 of 14 | +3.7 | +0.26 | -2.6% | 51% |
| Basketball Sphere Web Panel · 7 writers | 6-6-0 | 50.0% 95% likely range 25–75% | 12 of 12 | -0.4 | -0.03 | -8.2% | 52% |
| The JuiceBox YouTube Panel · 2 writers | 5-8-0 | 38.5% 95% likely range 18–64% | 13 of 13 | -3.0 | -0.23 | -4.4% | 50% |
Fewer than 8 graded picks (4 sources)
| Source | Graded W-L-P | Win % | Priced picks | Points | Per pick | CLV | Avg fair win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VseProSport Telegram | 3-1-0 | 75.0% 95% likely range 30–95% | 4 of 4 | — (4 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -10.6% | 50% |
| Exklusive Sportwetten Telegram | 1-1-0 | 50.0% 95% likely range 9–91% | 2 of 2 | — (2 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -3.4% | 56% |
| Covers Web Panel · 6 writers | 0-1-0 | 0.0% 95% likely range 0–79% | 1 of 1 | — (1 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | — | 42% |
| TheTargetBet Telegram | 0-1-0 | 0.0% 95% likely range 0–79% | 1 of 1 | — (1 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -2.6% | 54% |
Team totals (4 with graded picks)
No sources with at least 15 graded team totals picks yet; the early-sample and small-sample lists below show who is on the way.
Fewer than 8 graded picks (4 sources)
| Source | Graded W-L-P | Win % | Priced picks | Points | Per pick | CLV | Avg fair win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TheTargetBet Telegram | 4-1-0 | 80.0% 95% likely range 38–96% | 5 of 5 | — (5 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -6.2% | 54% |
| Pickswise Web Panel · 8 writers | 2-1-0 | 66.7% 95% likely range 21–94% | 3 of 3 | — (3 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -6.2% | 50% |
| Basketball Sphere Web Panel · 7 writers | 1-1-0 | 50.0% 95% likely range 9–91% | 2 of 2 | — (2 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -3.9% | 51% |
| BetBlog Web Panel · 2 writers | 1-0-0 | 100.0% 95% likely range 21–100% | 1 of 1 | — (1 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -2.4% | 52% |
Named analysts
One person counts once. A writer who publishes under the same full name at more than one outlet is one record, listed under the outlet with the larger graded sample, and a pick posted at both outlets is counted once. Outlet columns and channels without a byline are listed on the sources page.
Moneyline (winner) (14 with graded picks)
No analysts with at least 15 graded moneyline (winner) picks yet; the early-sample and small-sample lists below show who is on the way.
Fewer than 8 graded picks (14 analysts)
| Analyst | Graded W-L-P | Win % | Priced picks | Points | Per pick | CLV | Avg fair win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jon Metler Covers | 3-4-0 | 42.9% 95% likely range 16–75% | 7 of 7 | — (7 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | — | 63% |
| Brandon Sachs Pickswise | 3-1-0 | 75.0% 95% likely range 30–95% | 4 of 4 | — (4 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | +5.7% | 45% |
| Mattias Andersen Basketball Sphere | 3-1-0 | 75.0% 95% likely range 30–95% | 4 of 4 | — (4 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -8.2% | 57% |
| Claw The JuiceBox | 1-1-0 | 50.0% 95% likely range 9–91% | 2 of 2 | — (2 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -7.8% | 50% |
| Filip Tomic Pickswise | 1-1-0 | 50.0% 95% likely range 9–91% | 2 of 2 | — (2 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | +41.3% | 32% |
| Marchionni Basketball Sphere | 0-2-0 | 0.0% 95% likely range 0–66% | 2 of 2 | — (2 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -8.0% | 52% |
| Tufi TPG Basketball Sphere | 2-0-0 | 100.0% 95% likely range 34–100% | 2 of 2 | — (2 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -7.3% | 57% |
| CASHKING BetBlog | 0-1-0 | 0.0% 95% likely range 0–79% | 1 of 1 | — (1 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | — | 51% |
| Chris Walder Covers | 0-1-0 | 0.0% 95% likely range 0–79% | 1 of 1 | — (1 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | — | 47% |
| Dr. Doom Basketball Sphere | 0-1-0 | 0.0% 95% likely range 0–79% | 1 of 1 | — (1 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | — | 54% |
| Jazz Ray Big Al | 1-0-0 | 100.0% 95% likely range 21–100% | 1 of 1 | — (1 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -10.3% | 52% |
| Mr. Reddington Basketball Sphere | 1-0-0 | 100.0% 95% likely range 21–100% | 1 of 1 | — (1 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -13.0% | 46% |
| Mr. Reese Basketball Sphere | 1-0-0 | 100.0% 95% likely range 21–100% | 1 of 1 | — (1 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -9.3% | 52% |
| Wighty The JuiceBox | 1-0-0 | 100.0% 95% likely range 21–100% | 1 of 1 | — (1 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | +0.8% | 51% |
Spread (38 with graded picks)
No analysts with at least 15 graded spread picks yet; the early-sample and small-sample lists below show who is on the way.
Early sample · 8 to 14 graded picks (3 analysts)
These analysts have between 8 and 14 graded picks on this market. They are listed with their 95% likely ranges until they reach the 15-pick threshold for the main standings.
| Analyst | Graded W-L-P | Win % | Priced picks | Points | Per pick | CLV | Avg fair win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mattias Andersen Basketball Sphere | 6-3-0 | 66.7% 95% likely range 35–88% | 8 of 9 | — (8 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -5.5% | 59% |
| Randy Chambers Sports Chat Place | 2-6-0 | 25.0% 95% likely range 7–59% | 8 of 8 | — (8 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | — | 50% |
| Tufi TPG Basketball Sphere | 4-6-0 | 40.0% 95% likely range 17–69% | 9 of 10 | — (9 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -5.8% | 53% |
Fewer than 8 graded picks (35 analysts)
| Analyst | Graded W-L-P | Win % | Priced picks | Points | Per pick | CLV | Avg fair win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Filip Tomic Pickswise | 1-6-0 | 14.3% 95% likely range 3–51% | 7 of 7 | — (7 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -1.7% | 50% |
| Mr. Reese Basketball Sphere | 3-3-0 | 50.0% 95% likely range 19–81% | 6 of 6 | — (6 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -6.6% | 54% |
| Peter Tran Sports Chat Place | 3-3-0 | 50.0% 95% likely range 19–81% | 6 of 6 | — (6 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | — | 50% |
| eastcoast Betrush | 2-4-0 | 33.3% 95% likely range 10–70% | 6 of 6 | — (6 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -1.3% | 51% |
| Ben Dezell Pickswise | 3-1-0 | 75.0% 95% likely range 30–95% | 4 of 4 | — (4 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | +0.1% | 51% |
| Brandon Sachs Pickswise | 4-0-0 | 100.0% 95% likely range 51–100% | 4 of 4 | — (4 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -2.4% | 51% |
| Harry Gagnon Big Al | 2-2-0 | 50.0% 95% likely range 15–85% | 4 of 4 | — (4 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -3.5% | 51% |
| Marchionni Basketball Sphere | 4-0-0 | 100.0% 95% likely range 51–100% | 4 of 4 | — (4 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -7.7% | 54% |
| Chris Walder Covers | 1-2-0 | 33.3% 95% likely range 6–79% | 3 of 3 | — (3 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -3.0% | 50% |
| Justin Ziolkowski Pickswise | 1-1-1 | 50.0% 95% likely range 9–91% | 3 of 3 | — (3 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -0.7% | 50% |
| Corey Scott Sportsbook Review | 1-1-0 | 50.0% 95% likely range 9–91% | 2 of 2 | — (2 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -5.0% | 51% |
| Dr. Doom Basketball Sphere | 1-1-0 | 50.0% 95% likely range 9–91% | 2 of 2 | — (2 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -5.8% | 57% |
| Juan Carlos Blanco Covers | 2-0-0 | 100.0% 95% likely range 34–100% | 2 of 2 | — (2 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | — | 51% |
| Kyle Hunter Big Al | 0-2-0 | 0.0% 95% likely range 0–66% | 2 of 2 | — (2 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -2.5% | 50% |
| Milenko Janjić Basketball Sphere | 0-2-0 | 0.0% 95% likely range 0–66% | 1 of 2 | — (1 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -0.8% | 54% |
| Oliver Rossi Big Al | 1-1-0 | 50.0% 95% likely range 9–91% | 2 of 2 | — (2 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -3.8% | 51% |
| Tom Stryker Big Al | 1-1-0 | 50.0% 95% likely range 9–91% | 2 of 2 | — (2 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -5.2% | 52% |
| Wayne Root Big Al | 1-1-0 | 50.0% 95% likely range 9–91% | 2 of 2 | — (2 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -5.1% | 51% |
| Wighty The JuiceBox | 2-0-0 | 100.0% 95% likely range 34–100% | 2 of 2 | — (2 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -4.5% | 50% |
| Al McMordie Big Al | 0-1-0 | 0.0% 95% likely range 0–79% | 1 of 1 | — (1 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -6.5% | 50% |
| Ameer Tyree BettingPros (YouTube) | 1-0-0 | 100.0% 95% likely range 21–100% | 0 of 1 | — (0 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | — | — |
| Andrew-Bets Betrush | 0-1-0 | 0.0% 95% likely range 0–79% | 1 of 1 | — (1 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -1.2% | 51% |
| Brandon Kravitz The Action Network (YouTube) | 0-1-0 | 0.0% 95% likely range 0–79% | 1 of 1 | — (1 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | — | 50% |
| Claw The JuiceBox | 0-1-0 | 0.0% 95% likely range 0–79% | 1 of 1 | — (1 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | — | 50% |
| Frank Big Al | 1-0-0 | 100.0% 95% likely range 21–100% | 1 of 1 | — (1 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -4.3% | 51% |
| Geoff Clark Covers | 1-0-0 | 100.0% 95% likely range 21–100% | 1 of 1 | — (1 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | — | 51% |
| Jazz Ray Big Al | 1-0-0 | 100.0% 95% likely range 21–100% | 1 of 1 | — (1 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -4.5% | 50% |
| Liam Fox Sportsbook Review | 1-0-0 | 100.0% 95% likely range 21–100% | 1 of 1 | — (1 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -4.5% | 52% |
| Max Pickswise | 0-1-0 | 0.0% 95% likely range 0–79% | 1 of 1 | — (1 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | — | 51% |
| Quinn Allen Covers | 0-1-0 | 0.0% 95% likely range 0–79% | 1 of 1 | — (1 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | — | 49% |
| Sam Avellone Pickswise | 0-1-0 | 0.0% 95% likely range 0–79% | 1 of 1 | — (1 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -2.0% | 50% |
| SirMasaryk Betrush | 1-0-0 | 100.0% 95% likely range 21–100% | 1 of 1 | — (1 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | — | 50% |
| William Burns Big Al | 1-0-0 | 100.0% 95% likely range 21–100% | 1 of 1 | — (1 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -6.5% | 52% |
| psyhz Betrush | 1-0-0 | 100.0% 95% likely range 21–100% | 1 of 1 | — (1 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -1.2% | 51% |
| rocky1 BetBlog | 0-1-0 | 0.0% 95% likely range 0–79% | 1 of 1 | — (1 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -6.5% | 50% |
Over/under (20 with graded picks)
No analysts with at least 15 graded over/under picks yet; the early-sample and small-sample lists below show who is on the way.
Fewer than 8 graded picks (20 analysts)
| Analyst | Graded W-L-P | Win % | Priced picks | Points | Per pick | CLV | Avg fair win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Filip Tomic Pickswise | 1-4-0 | 20.0% 95% likely range 4–62% | 5 of 5 | — (5 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -3.4% | 50% |
| Justin Ziolkowski Pickswise | 1-4-0 | 20.0% 95% likely range 4–62% | 4 of 5 | — (4 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -1.8% | 50% |
| Claw The JuiceBox | 1-2-0 | 33.3% 95% likely range 6–79% | 3 of 3 | — (3 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -5.5% | 50% |
| Sean Murphy Big Al | 2-1-0 | 66.7% 95% likely range 21–94% | 3 of 3 | — (3 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -4.2% | 51% |
| Tufi TPG Basketball Sphere | 0-3-0 | 0.0% 95% likely range 0–56% | 3 of 3 | — (3 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -7.4% | 52% |
| Wighty The JuiceBox | 2-1-0 | 66.7% 95% likely range 21–94% | 3 of 3 | — (3 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -4.2% | 50% |
| Ben Dezell Pickswise | 2-0-0 | 100.0% 95% likely range 34–100% | 2 of 2 | — (2 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -4.8% | 49% |
| Harry Gagnon Big Al | 2-0-0 | 100.0% 95% likely range 34–100% | 2 of 2 | — (2 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | +1.0% | 53% |
| Kyle Hunter Big Al | 2-0-0 | 100.0% 95% likely range 34–100% | 2 of 2 | — (2 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -3.1% | 50% |
| Marchionni Basketball Sphere | 2-0-0 | 100.0% 95% likely range 34–100% | 2 of 2 | — (2 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -3.7% | 52% |
| Mattias Andersen Basketball Sphere | 1-1-0 | 50.0% 95% likely range 9–91% | 2 of 2 | — (2 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -6.8% | 52% |
| Oliver Rossi Big Al | 0-2-0 | 0.0% 95% likely range 0–66% | 2 of 2 | — (2 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -2.5% | 52% |
| Al McMordie Big Al | 1-0-0 | 100.0% 95% likely range 21–100% | 1 of 1 | — (1 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -3.7% | 50% |
| Brandon Sachs Pickswise | 1-0-0 | 100.0% 95% likely range 21–100% | 1 of 1 | — (1 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | +0.5% | 50% |
| Dr. Doom Basketball Sphere | 1-0-0 | 100.0% 95% likely range 21–100% | 1 of 1 | — (1 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -11.5% | 50% |
| Jim Feist Big Al | 1-0-0 | 100.0% 95% likely range 21–100% | 1 of 1 | — (1 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -1.0% | 50% |
| Joe Williams Pickswise | 1-0-0 | 100.0% 95% likely range 21–100% | 1 of 1 | — (1 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -6.0% | 49% |
| Milenko Janjić Basketball Sphere | 1-0-0 | 100.0% 95% likely range 21–100% | 1 of 1 | — (1 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -6.9% | 54% |
| Mr. Reese Basketball Sphere | 0-1-0 | 0.0% 95% likely range 0–79% | 1 of 1 | — (1 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -11.6% | 56% |
| Zak Hanshew Covers | 0-1-0 | 0.0% 95% likely range 0–79% | 1 of 1 | — (1 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | — | 42% |
Team totals (3 with graded picks)
No analysts with at least 15 graded team totals picks yet; the early-sample and small-sample lists below show who is on the way.
Fewer than 8 graded picks (3 analysts)
| Analyst | Graded W-L-P | Win % | Priced picks | Points | Per pick | CLV | Avg fair win % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Filip Tomic Pickswise | 2-0-0 | 100.0% 95% likely range 34–100% | 2 of 2 | — (2 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -7.0% | 50% |
| Mattias Andersen Basketball Sphere | 1-1-0 | 50.0% 95% likely range 9–91% | 2 of 2 | — (2 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -3.9% | 51% |
| CASHKING BetBlog | 1-0-0 | 100.0% 95% likely range 21–100% | 1 of 1 | — (1 priced; min. 10 for points) | — | -2.4% | 52% |
Weekly leaders
Week 3 · winner · 1 source with 8+ graded picks
| Place | Source | Graded W-L-P | Win % | Priced picks | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ProtoLab (프로토랩) Web | 15-7-0 | 68.2% 95% likely range 47–84% | 22 of 22 | +0.3 |
Week 2 · winner · 1 source with 8+ graded picks
| Place | Source | Graded W-L-P | Win % | Priced picks | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ProtoLab (프로토랩) Web | 9-5-0 | 64.3% 95% likely range 39–84% | 14 of 14 | +4.7 |
Found an error on this page? Write to editors@hunchmeter.com; every confirmed fix is logged on the corrections page.